top of page
7IM_logo_RGB_JPG_Black Red_100mm_edited_
quilter-logo-white-rgb.png

LOGIN:

Client Update - 4th December 2025

  • ChetwoodWM
  • 6 hours ago
  • 2 min read

Our chancellor has allegedly not been forthcoming with the truth. She has also implicated the Prime Minister in her misinformation. The Head of the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) has been sacrificed after the release of last week’s budget information before the actual budget. I remember apologising for repeatedly writing about President Trump earlier in the year, and it feels that I am now continuously writing about our embattled chancellor. If the markets and the public can no longer trust what she is telling us, then should she be allowed to stay? I am not sure she would have survived in a normal business environment.


The ”omni” scandal view is an interesting one. As Labour have a scandal on a weekly basis, then each one carries less and less importance and the news flow moves on to the following week, expecting something else to report on. Maybe this saves her position once more.


When Reeves called an early Tuesday morning press conference in the lead up to her budget, she did make it clear that big tax rises were coming, and she was right. She talked about the importance to her of measures to try to address the cost of living, and they were there in her Budget last week. She expressed a desire for more wriggle room in the spreadsheets against her self-imposed fiscal rules – so-called "headroom". She delivered on that too, as she did on maintaining long term, investment spending.


The key point is, she also talked about productivity, the OBR’s reduction in estimated productivity growth and this decision by the OBR had big implications for Reeves – impacting the numbers, spreadsheets and therefore the calculations and trade-offs she would have to make. Hard choices needed to be made. However, she neglected to mention one key matter.


It now turns out that tax receipts as a result of wage growth inflation were much better than expected and more than offset the reduction in productivity growth and she knew this at the time and did not mention it. The OBR has since made that very clear and set out the timetable of when it told the Treasury what – including that the chancellor knew about the tax receipts data at the time of the news conference. A week later the Financial Times broke the news that income tax rates would not be going up as a result of this increased tax revenue.


Hopefully, as a result of this disappointing week, the chancellor will at least now share with us good news along with the seemingly endless bad news and firmly on my Christmas list is a hope for honesty and transparency. I would also ask for a growth plan – please – but I fear that this may be a step to far, even in the season of giving. I need some good news, so I will go back to looking at clients’ portfolios, that have had a remarkably strong 2025, given all of the negativity and concerns over high US equity valuations. This has again underlined our “stay calm and keep invested” methodology – try and ignore short term noise and focus on the longer-term opportunities. Do have a good weekend.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Client update - 27th November 2025

The run-up to the 2025 Budget may have been characterised by greater conjecture about what would, or wouldn’t, be announced than in perhaps any other “pre-fiscal event” period in the UK’s modern polit

 
 
 
Client Update - 21st November 2025

Back to the markets this week and I will start with Nvidia, whose sales of microchips at the heart of the artificial intelligence boom in the last quarter rose even faster than Wall Street anticipated

 
 
 
Client Update - 14th November 2025

Sir Keir Starmer is nervously looking over his shoulder. A huge majority 18 months ago has turned quickly into contempt and disillusionment. These days, a Prime Minister is not safe in power. Baroness

 
 
 

Comments


© 2018 by Chetwood WM.
Created by jim-media.co.uk.

Chetwood Wealth Management Limited is registered in England & Wales No. 4021559
Registered office: St Denys House, 22 East Hill, St. Austell, Cornwall PL25 4TR
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority No. 195024


The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate some forms of tax, will & trust advice.  The guidance and/or advice contained in this website is subject to UK regulatory regime and is therefore restricted to consumers based in the UK.  The value of investments may fluctuate in price or value and you may get back less than the amount originally invested.  Past performance is not a guide to the future.  The views expressed on this website represent those of the author and do not constitute financial advice.
 

CDA_Logo_Member_RGB.png
bottom of page